Foundershub

❦ OPINION · Database & backend

Convex vs Neon

Side by side: strengths, tradeoffs, features, pricing, and who each one fits. Same rubric, no editor's thumb on the scale, no winner declared — you decide.

❦ How each one performs

Founder fit by dimension

DimensionConvexNeon
Setup speed8.8

`npx convex dev` to running schema in 3 minutes.

9.0

Database in 30 seconds; connection string ready to paste.

Ease of use9.0

Best DX in the category if you're a TypeScript dev.

8.8

Pure database — clean for engineers comfortable with Postgres.

Pricing transparency8.0

Tiers are clear; usage-based above adds variance.

9.0

Scale-to-zero pricing is unusual but explained well.

Integrations7.5

Auth integrates with Clerk / Auth0 cleanly; ecosystem still growing.

8.0

Standard Postgres clients; ORM support is universal.

Solo-founder fit8.5

Free tier carries side projects; Pro covers early MRR.

8.5

Free tier covers serious development; $19 covers first MRR.

❦ Feature matrix

Features

FeatureConvexNeon
PostgreSQL (real)no (custom)● Yes
Auth (built-in)via Clerk / Auth0— No
Realtime subscriptionsyes (default)— No
File storage● Yes— No
Edge functions● Yes— No
Auto-generated REST API● Yes— No
End-to-end typesafe● Yes— No
Scheduled functions / cron● Yes— No
Vector / embeddings● Yes— No
Connection poolingn/a● Yes
Self-hostable— Nolimited
TypeScript-first● Yes— No
Branching (DB per PR)— Noyes (signature feature)
Point-in-time recovery— NoScale tier
Scale-to-zero compute— No● Yes
Vector / pgvector— No● Yes
Region availability— NoAWS, Azure (multi-region)

❦ Every tier, side by side

Pricing

Convex

Starter$01 GB storage, 1M function calls / mo
Professional$25/mo + usageHigher limits, scheduled jobs, vector search
EnterpriseCustomSLAs, dedicated infra, support

Neon

Free$00.5 GB storage, 1 project, 10 branches
Launch$19/mo10 GB storage, 100 branches, advanced features
Scale$69/moHigher limits, point-in-time recovery
BusinessCustomDedicated, SLAs, SOC 2

❦ What each one is genuinely good at, and what to know going in

Strengths and tradeoffs

Convex

Strengths

  • Best typesafe DX in the backend-as-a-service category
  • Reactive queries — UI updates without manual subscription wiring
  • Built-in scheduled functions, file storage, vector search
  • Free tier is generous enough for real prototypes

Tradeoffs

  • Not Postgres — migration to a standard database is non-trivial
  • Smaller community and ecosystem than Supabase
  • Some patterns (complex joins, raw SQL) require workarounds

Neon

Strengths

  • Database branching — preview DBs per PR, with real data
  • Scale-to-zero on compute means idle environments cost almost nothing
  • Pure Postgres — no platform lock-in beyond connection string
  • Cold-start time is sub-second for most workloads

Tradeoffs

  • Bring your own auth, storage, realtime — extra wiring compared to Supabase
  • Ecosystem is smaller — fewer pre-built examples and tutorials
  • Cold starts on free tier can surprise users on rare paths

❦ Who each one is built for

Fit by founder type

Founder typeConvexNeon
Solo FounderStrong fit

If you're TypeScript-first, this is the fastest DX in backend-as-service.

Strong fit

If you bring your own auth, this is the cleanest Postgres play.

Small TeamStrong fit

Designed for this size — reactive apps without backend engineering team.

Strong fit

Branching makes staging environments dramatically cheaper.

AgencyNot the right fit

Per-project lock-in makes agency multi-tenant work painful.

Workable

Per-project DBs are clean; team-multi-tenant pricing needs care.

❦ Quick reference

Key facts

Convex

2021
San Francisco, CA
Tens of thousands of projects
Cursor, Anthropic Console (parts), Lerna
$56M Series A (2024)

Neon

2021
Remote
100,000+ databases
Databricks (2025, $1B+)
Vercel (for Vercel Postgres), Replit

❦ When to pick each

Two right answers, two different situations.

Pick Convex when

If you're TypeScript-first, this is the fastest DX in backend-as-service.

Pick Neon when

If you bring your own auth, this is the cleanest Postgres play.